?

Log in

Apr. 4th, 2007 @ 11:32 am Rant Post #12
About this Entry
macca
abromeds:
[User Picture Icon]
From:minds_opaque
Date:April 5th, 2007 04:40 pm (UTC)

Re: Was Ringo really blameless?

(Permanent Link)
I don't blame Paul one bit for saying, "Well, then, fuck ya! See you in court, assholes."

And see, that wasn't even his attitude. He describes himself agonizing over whether he had any other choice but to sue them. Paul was definitely betrayed, but I don't see any sign that he went the revenge route. That's pretty cool.
[User Picture Icon]
From:abromeds
Date:April 5th, 2007 04:45 pm (UTC)

Re: Was Ringo really blameless?

(Permanent Link)
Hmm, I would say it was a bit of both. I don't doubt the decision was excruciating, but that doesn't mean he wasn't pissed as well. With a capital "sst." ;D
[User Picture Icon]
From:minds_opaque
Date:April 5th, 2007 04:50 pm (UTC)

Re: Was Ringo really blameless?

(Permanent Link)
Could be! I don't know how much his anger went into the decision to go to court. But when the other Beatles were calling it a betrayal, Paul could say not only did he have to do it, but they betrayed him first.