?

Log in

Apr. 4th, 2007 @ 11:32 am Rant Post #12
About this Entry
macca
abromeds:
[User Picture Icon]
From:minds_opaque
Date:April 7th, 2007 02:22 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Because of the filial connection they had, I doubt that George would have left quite so easily and soon, though. If he had an outlet for his songs, that may have appeased him.
Good point, he would try to get what he needed in the Beatles and only leave as a last resort.

On the other hand, I think he was already fed up with his little brother status. Remember when George died and Paul said "he was just my little brother?" If he said that 40 years later, how likely is it that he would have changed his attitude in time for George to stay in the band? I doubt George would have wanted to stick around if it meant that no matter what he did or said or wrote, he would always be John and Paul's little brother.

Heh, I'm making it sound like George broke up the Beatles. Well, if the open-marriage deal had worked, he probably would have.
[User Picture Icon]
From:abromeds
Date:April 7th, 2007 04:13 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
That's a really interesting thing to think about. I think back in '69 the tug of the Beatles might just have kept George around, if, like you've said, he had an outlet for his songs and a regular escape from the Lil Bro treatment.

He did an interview in '70 that supports that theory:

GEORGE: I think this is a good way, you know, if we do our own albums. That way we don't have to compromise. I mean, we lose whatever we get from each other... I'm sure that after we've all completed an album or even two albums each, then that novelty will have worn off.

Q: You think the Beatles will get together again, then?

GEORGE: Uhh... Well, I don't... I couldn't tell, you know, if they do or not. I'll certainly try my best to do something with them again, you know. I mean, it's only a matter of accepting that the situation is a compromise. In a way it's a compromise, and it's a sacrifice, you know, because we all have to sacrifice a little in order to gain something really big. And there is a big gain by recording together -- I think musically, and financially, and also spiritually. And for the rest of the world, you know, I think that Beatle music is such a big sort of scene -- that I think it's the least we could do is to sacrifice three months of the year at least, you know, just to do an album or two. I think it's very selfish if the Beatles don't record together...

And it'll all be okay, you know. Just give 'em time because they do really love each other, you know. I mean, we all do. We've been so close and through so much together that it really... But the main thing is, like in anybody's life, they have slight problems. And it's just that our problems are always blown up, and uhh, you know, shown to everybody. But it's not really... it's not a problem. It's only a problem if you think about it.

...It's just a matter of time, you know, just for everybody to work out their own problems and once they've done that I'm sure we'll get back 'round the cycle again. But if not, you know, it's still alright. Whatever happens, you know, it's gonna be okay.


Of course, it's been theorized that George's optimism might have been a bit of a PR ploy at this point, partly to help out with the lawsuit. So maybe that's all it is... or maybe he was being sincere. Either way, it's interesting.
[User Picture Icon]
From:minds_opaque
Date:April 7th, 2007 07:14 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Oh, thanks for showing me that, I hadn't seen that interview before!

If you take him at his word, it sounds like he thought the open-marriage thing was going on and he was fine with it. (Oops, sounds like I was wrong before!) I wonder if he was really as laid back about it as he sounds here.
[User Picture Icon]
From:geminigirl58
Date:April 7th, 2007 10:22 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
That is an interesting interview! Perhaps it was PR but maybe he genuinely felt that. No doubt that was prior to the lawsuit. It's interesting how he pins in all on J&P and kind of insinuates that everyone doing their own thing for a few albums will be enough to get it out of their system. Sounds like, at least at that point, he wasn't ready to let go of the group completely.
[User Picture Icon]
From:geminigirl58
Date:April 7th, 2007 10:11 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Heh, I'm making it sound like George broke up the Beatles. Well, if the open-marriage deal had worked, he probably would have.

Nah, I don't think you are. With the open marriage concept, he would have been playing with other people but I don't would have been ready to leave the group entirely.

Yeah, when Paul used the "little brother" comment when George died, I winced,although Paul said it with love and affection. I don't know if George could ever have gotten out of that baby brother role with J&P. Their memories of him is child-like. It's like once someone is your child, even though they are all grown up and you may respect that individual as an adult, you still get flashes of when they were a child. And they still will always be "your baby".